Green Street
NEED TO KNOW
Don't forget to follow Ben on Twitter.
AT&T
A WEEI.com Celtics Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Rajon Rondo and his Celtics teammates let the Kendrick Perkins trade get into their heads 07.26.11 at 1:27 pm ET
By

Time often puts things into proper perspective.

In the weeks following the Kendrick Perkins trade in late February, Celtics president of basketball operations Danny Ainge dismissed the notion that any professional athlete would let the trade of a friend off the court affect his play between the lines.

Five months later, Rajon Rondo admitted to Yahoo! Sports that The Trade influenced the team “more than it should have” — and that was a mistake. Here’s what the C’s point guard said Tuesday of the deal that sent Perkins along with Nate Robinson to Oklahoma City for Jeff Green and Nenad Krstic:

“It wasn’t like the man passed away or something. I think we put too much emphasis on it. It’s a business. He got traded. He’s very happy where he’s at. We still talk and I’m always going to have his back. It shouldn’t have affected us the way it affected us.”

Of course, if you remember the fifth episode of NBA Entertainment’s “The Association: Boston Celtics,” which aired soon after the Feb. 24 trade, Rondo sang a different tune at the time:

“A lot of people say it’s a business, but that’s personal — losing one of your best friends. Perk and I were really close. On the road, we were together every day, as far as going out to eat, going out to the mall, just little things. I don’t have that right now, and it’s tough to deal with. … It’s kind of different now, especially once you go on the road. It’s a little different. You don’t hang out with the same guy you usually hang out with. It’s hard losing a friend. Nobody died, but … especially with the starting five, we had a pretty good core, a pretty good group.”

Obviously, the C’s 11-11 record in the final 22 regular-season games and the following splits from Rondo in the month of March suggest that their friend’s departure cost the team regular-season victories:

When Perkins turned down the C’s maximum possible offer of four years and $22 million and then signed a four-year, $34.8 million extension five days after joining the Thunder, we knew for sure he was never going to be seen in green after the 2010-11 NBA season regardless of The Trade. And when Perkins averaged just 4.5 points and 6.1 rebounds in 28 playoff minutes a night for the Thunder, it became extremely difficult for any opponent of The Trade to argue his presence would have made the difference against the Heat.

It’s no wonder the Celtics had so much trouble incorporating Green (and Krstic) into the team’s offensive and defensive schemes. When players — including the point guard — are sulking about the loss of their friend, that doesn’t exactly make the best welcoming committee for incoming teammates.

Maybe by initiating Green into their Ubuntu fraternity earlier the Celtics would have won a few more regular-season games, captured the Eastern Conference’s No. 1 seed, coasted into the conference finals and made a more formidable opponent for the Heat and Mavericks. Instead, Green often looked lost on the court, in large part because the Big Four made him feel like an outsider.

Does Ainge deserve some of the blame for underestimating the emotional impact the Perkins deal would have on his team’s locker room? Sure. But don’t the players deserve a bigger piece of the blame pie for lacking the professionalism to deal with The Trade? Rondo seems to think so.

Yup, time often puts things into proper perspective.

***

In addition to his comments about Perkins, Rondo opined on a number of subjects in his interview with Yahoo! Sports. Here are the rest of the highlights from that candid discussion:

  • On the future: “We got five people under contract, right? [It's actually six] But I think we got five good people under contract, through. We’ll form a team again. I think we’ll be fine as a team and we’ll be fine in the future. That’s the plan.”
  • On Glen Davis: “I’d like to play with Baby. But Baby is going to do what’s best for Baby.”
  • On Doc Rivers: “Doc’s proven with the players that we have that he will have a winning record. But most of all, he’s never going to settle. We always want to win a championship. That’s the only goal we have as a team and that’s his mindset. When you talk to him, he believes we have the talent and the ability to win a championship. That’s our standard. He holds us accountable.”
  • On title chances: “They said we were done two years ago. We could care less about that. We could care less about people saying we are done.”

Great stuff from Marc J. Spears on Rondo, who isn’t exactly the most forthcoming guy on the C’s roster. My one gripe: How do you have a lengthy interview with Rondo this offseason without even mentioning the elbow injury he suffered in that Heat series?

Read More: Boston Celtics, Danny Ainge, Kendrick Perkins, Rajon Rondo Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • Myles

    listen pal, the trade IS the reason the Celtics got KOed in the second round. Arguing Perkins’ stats on another team is northing short of idiotic.

  • Ben Rohrbach

    Perkins himself admitted that he felt about 60 percent during the playoffs this past season due to injuries he suffered before the trade. Do you honestly believe a 60 percent Perkins would have won the Celtics an addition three games in that Heat series? That seems fairly ridiculous … pal.

  • Jackko

    Ainge is a Snake and he killed Ubuntu with the Perk trade .

    End of Story .

  • paul

    You guys are just such disgusting stooges. No, the fault lay mostly with Ainge and we aren’t so stupid that we can’t see that the guy who disrupted the team with a month to go in the season IS THE GUY WHO DISRUPTED THE TEAM.

    See how that’s kind of logical? I know you guys are reallllyy good at blowing smoke, but you are not that good.

  • paul

    Oh, and Ben, YA STOOGE, how would you compare Shaq at zero percent to Perk at 60%? Pal? How would you compare Jermaine, bravely playing at maybe 50%, or less, to Perkins at 60%? You know damn well how they compare ya stooge. We needed a starting center to win a championship and we didn’t have one, because of what Danny did, not because of what Rondo did. And more than that we needed cohesion, and massive makeover with a month to go in the season destroyed that. But you keep defending Danny. I don’t know what your stake in it is, but it stinks.

    • Ben Rohrbach

      Paul, I’d actually compare Jermaine O’Neal’s “50 percent” pretty favorably to Perkins’ “60 percent”:

      Perkins played all 17 playoff games for the Thunder, averaging 4.5 points (on 45.3 percent shooting), 6.1 rebounds, 1.6 turnovers, 0.8 blocks, 0.8 assists and 0.2 steals in 28.2 minutes.

      O’Neal played all nine playoff games for the Celtics, averaging more points (5.8 at a more efficient 48.8 percent shooting), more blocks (1.8), more assists (0.9) and fewer turnovers (0.9) in fewer minutes (21.9). He did average fewer rebounds (4.2), but his superior shot-making and shot-blocking as well as the fewer turnovers surely made up for that.

      The Celtics got beat because Miami’s Big Three (71 points per game in the conference semis) outplayed Boston’s Big Three (50 points per game in that series) and Rondo suffered a debilitating injury, not because Perk wasn’t there to stop the superhuman efforts of Big Z and Joel Anthony. With Perkins, the C’s weren’t going to be raising the 2011 NBA championship banner.

      At the time of the deal, Ainge acquired a 24-year-old double-digit scorer and starter for a 50-win team and a starting center in Krstic (whose injury he obviously couldn’t have seen coming) for an injured Perkins who was never going to be more than 60 percent and was gone after the season regardless of the deal.

      Sure, Ainge disrupted the team chemistry with almost two months to go in the season, but the players also sulked over a move that didn’t make the team any worse this past season and made them stronger going forward.

      But what do I know? I’m just a stooge who uses actual statistics to back up my argument.

  • bags

    yes Perk would have been better than what we had, but he would not have won the championship at 60%; Danny was simply trying to spark the team,while getting some youth for the future- it didn’t work out, guess what? it doesn’t work out for 31 teams every year– Celts take chances like every other club in all of sports– how’d that trade for Gagne work out(sox)? what about adalius (pats)? and need i say kaberle (bruins)– (yes they won the cup, but that was despite kabs, not because of him, 10% on PP is horrid beyond belief)– get your panties unbunched, and realize that no one is perfect. Ainge did bring us a championship, so he does have a clue. the bigger issue to me is why the big 3 can no longer dominate– too old? too complacent after winning one? – either way, hoops is a young mans game, and we need some folks to run with rondo- perk really is not that type of player; look at the big picture instead of being myopic in your assessments

  • http://WWW.marcoseven7.bz Fredrick Varvel

    I think other web-site proprietors should take this web site as an model, very clean and magnificent user friendly style and design, let alone the content. You’re an expert in this topic!

  • http://weei.com dr co

    All of you Perkins lovers are lost about bball. Perk wasn’t Russell. How this team lost was injuries. If
    quid was healthy if shaq was healthy. Then we would have been different. With perk healthy and no healthy shaw and quid. Perk meant nothing. Get over it perk isn’t Russell

  • Kevin Denver

    Perk could not stay healthy and wsa always hurt in the playoffs. And if you can not pay him what he wants, and the C’s could not and keep the other talent, might as well trade him and get something for him.

Celtics Box Score
Celtics Schedule
Celtics Headlines
NBA Headlines