Green Street
NEED TO KNOW
Don't forget to follow Ben on Twitter.
A WEEI.com Celtics Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Fast Break: Celtics hang tough against Clippers 03.13.12 at 1:37 am ET
By

The Celtics’ 94-85 come-from-behind victory against the upstart Clippers on Monday night certainly gives the team a sense of confidence going into the last month of the season. Boston improved its road record to 6-11, which is an encouraging sign since the schedule puts the C’s away from the confines of the Garden for the majority of their remaining games.

Rajon Rondo registered a double-double (12 points and 10 assists) while Paul Pierce scored 25 points on 6-of-8 shooting. Kevin Garnett had an efficient night — 21 points on 8-of-16 shooting and two blocks. For the Clippers, Blake Griffin scored 24 points and grabbed nine rebounds.

WHAT WENT RIGHT

Resilient Vets: Well, sort of. The devil’s advocate would call it inconsistency. Either way, the Celtics had an auspicious start Monday night, leading the Clippers, 25-21, after the first quarter. Following a dismal second quarter, however, Boston trailed by nine at halftime, 48-39.

The Celtics came out and went on an inspired 15-2 run to open the second half. Boston’s defense was fantastic, holding the Clippers to a season-low 13 points in the third quarter.

The fourth quarter was just as volatile as the rest of the game. The Celtics opened up a 10-point lead, 71-61. The Clippers answered, going on a 17-7 run and the game was tied at 78 apiece in the waning moments. The Celtics finally closed the game out by going on a 16-7 run to secure the victory.

The Power of Balance: For the second straight game the all five of Boston’s starters scored in double-digits. Particularly encouraging was Brandon Bass’ performance: 10 points (5-of-6 shooting) and nine rebounds (three offensive). His confidence was not shaken after missing a critical jump shot which would have given the Celtics a late lead in the final minute against the Lakers on Sunday. Bass did foul out of the game with just over four minutes left, when the Clippers made a frantic run to re-take the lead.

Finding a happy medium: The Celtics’ season has been so up and down. When they win, they tend to go on elongated winning streaks. But, when the Celtics lose, the opposite happens. Part of this is the due to the compacted schedule, and part of this is because of injuries and lack of practice time.

It appears, at least in the last four games, the Celtics are bucking the trend. After a blowout loss against the 76ers last Wednesday night, Boston recovered by dismantling the Blazers in impressive fashion. Sunday’s battle against the Lakers saw the Celtics on the losing side despite an admirable effort. On the same court, the very next night, Boston responded yet again, staving off a solid Clipper team.

WHAT WENT WRONG

Second Quarter Lulls: The second frame has been a constant issue all year for the Celtics. Boston had only eight points through 8 1/2 minutes in the second quarter. 8 points?! Meanwhile, the Clippers grabbed firm control of the game, while closing out the half on an 18-6 run.

Rebounds: It was assumed the Celtics would get crushed in the interior against the Lakers Sunday — which they did — and it certainly was plausible that the athletic ability of DeAndre Jordan and Griffin would also present Boston with issues. With Chris Wilcox out indefinitely the Celtics — who were already the worst rebounding team in the league — are thin up front.

On the other hand, of the 11 Clipper first-half offensive rebounds, many came on 50/50 balls or even balls within the grasps of multiple Celtics. In particular was a play in which Reggie Evans out-hustled three Boston players and scored on a put-back.

Enjoying the Blake Show: Griffin had a tense match-up with Greg Stiemsma. At one point, both players were given dual-technical fouls after jawing at one another. In the second quarter meltdown, Griffin was fantastic. He put a nice touch on a left-handed baby hook over the outstretched arms of Garnett. In the next sequence down the court, Mo Williams found Griffin for a highlight-reel reverse alley-opp jam that will undoubtedly be on SportsCenter’s Top-10 plays and all over YouTube.  Griffin had 15 points at halftime. Check out the episode of “The Blake Show” below…

Peaches and, well, not much: The bench struggled again Monday night. Mickael Pietrus, Avery Bradley, and Stiemsma only had eight points between them. Bradley was effective in his time in the first half, but was non-existent the rest of the way. Stiemsma did his best to hold his own on the interior, but struggled for periods in his match-up against Griffin. Finally Pietrus — who the Celtics desperately need to produce — continued his cold shooting-streak, he is now 4-of-23 shooting in his last seven games, after going 1-for-4 from the field Monday night.

Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • JL5

    Rask played like the All Star he is becoming.  Claude’s line switch up pairing Seguin and Krejci was a fine move by the coach.  Always great to beat the Habs at home.

  • glenn88

    Good win, but that was 90% Tukka.  Losing Marchand really unsettles the lines.   Bruins were outplayed for most of the night and the Habs looked faster and more skilled.  Still believe the Bruins will need to trade for a good 3rd line player to help solidify the 3rd line and provide needed scoring depth.  

  • Christina

    This team is on fire!!!!! So much talent and everyone is producing. Keep up the good work.

  • Cfn

    I am sorry, was I reading an article on hockey or boxing?  Last time I checked the aim is to get the puck into the net as many times as possible.  Does fighting win games for you in hockey?  Serious question since I don’t watch hockey all that much.  Doesn’t it put your team into penalty and make it easier for the other team to score?

    • tony

      The casual fan will never understand and i truly wish they mtob, Go watch fiqure skating. Hockey has had fighting in it since they dropped tha first puck. Why should it change for the casual fan who isn’t going to watch it either way.

    • IfYou’reNOTaHockeyFan…

       Think of it similar to pitchers brushing back batters in baseball or offensive/defensive linemen beating on each other throughout a football game. But wait, isn’t baseball just about scoring runs and football just about scoring touchdowns? On the surface, perhaps, but sports aren’t that simple.

      It you have a big nasty brute who can hit hard but not score, what prevents him from just sticking to, intimidating and beating up your top scorers or just your teammates? That’s where muscle comes in. It’s the way hockey self-polices. It’s a way to establish physical and psychological advantage and momentum. It’s a way to make a statement. It can completely change momentum and games and series.

  • N15jb

    I hope we see a rematch sunday…i feel like it will probably go a little differently…..if it was a movie it could be called “How Thorty got his groove back”…cuz it was a strange thing seeing him get shalacked like that …gotta rebound

  • kozlodoev

    “The casual fan will never understand and i truly wish they mtob, Go watch fiqure skating. Hockey has had fighting in it since they dropped tha first puck. Why should it change for the casual fan who isn’t going to watch it either way.”

    Oh, sorry that casual fans want to mess it up for you. Maybe those wannabe “tough guys” should try MMA to see how much they’ll last? In any case, I have no desire to watch inferior fighting — if I want fights, I head over to see martial sports.

  • Johnny Spygate

    I’ll type slow so the hockey fans can understand: no one cares about your sport.  No one cares who won that fight of who lost.  I love the tough guys telling other posters to go “watch figure skating”.  Yeah, you tell’em, sport!!!  Tell those sports fans looking to watch actual sports to go f themselves!
    I’m bored now

    • Dope Hunter

      You seem to care John……..how’s the wife buddy?

    • Fab4ever

      Sorry John…once again your self-indulgence, this need of yours to pontificate, is ill advised..” no one cares about your sport”…actually John, folks love the sport…it’s just too fast for your slow and feeble mind to follow…maybe “Peter Puck” should now be called “Spygate Puck”…You’re bored? We’re bored with you…

    • Guest

       I like how you typed slow and still misspelled. I believe you meant to say “No one cares who won that fight or who lost.” Unfortunately, you said “No one cares who won that fight OF who lost.” Normally I wouldn’t make an asinine post about someone’s spelling, but when you make it a point to say you are going to type slow so us dumb witted hockey fans can understand. You basically open yourself up for this kind of ridicule.

    • Uncle Buck

      Do you walk around with a sign on your back which reads, “please do not pick on me, I am a world class idiot and I cannot help myself” ?  Whether you are aware of it or even if you care, that is the label you have earned here. Little John has made his daily pizz mark in the snow now.  Whoopdee effin doo.

      • Johnny Spygate

        Ouch.  Who are you really mad at, UB?  Was your oatmeal served cold or something this morning?  I know you older guys are very particular about that.  Why don’t you check back later when the fiber kicks in.  You’ll feel better and maybe not so angry.

        • Uncle Buck

          Mad at the mosquito who keeps buzzing around trolling the Boston sports boards.  No oatmeal kid.  Fiber is fine thanks for the concern.  Very little anger either.  Just tired of your juvenile crap and your dancing around like a little itching powder fairy spreading your irritating nonsense.  You know what I mean kid, you’re sitting outside on a nice sunny day enjoying life and you see a fat mosquito perched on your arm and you slap if flat dead.  Just makes you feel better.  Don’t blame me, just the messenger telling it like it is kid.

  • Jimmy Freeze

    If Buffalo is going to hire a thug to go after the Bruins…I think they should do the same…get Pollard some skates…and let him concuss the snot out of any Sabre that crosses the Red line.

  • CRY BAY-B’s

    He got KNOCKED THE F—- OUT! Plain and simple.  It’s part of the game, it has been for years.  Props to Thornton and Scott both for mutually accepting the fight, it’s not like Scott jumped Thornton, in fact, if you watch the reply Thornton had his gloves off and was swinging before Scott did.  

    He lost, got the sh– beat out of him, and has more games to try for redemption if he wants.  As for Chara fighting, I doubt he would have fared much better against Scott.  I’d really like to see Scott get his mitts on Lucic, one can only hope.

    Quit crying you BAY-B’s!!! I remember a lot of chest pounding and sh– talking from the B’s fans after Lucic cheap shot hit a goalie last year, total p-ssy move!

    • DABRUINS

      Thought you died…..too bad maybe tomorrow.

  • RedSx799

    He’s right. If John Scott pounds in Thornton’s skull, the Bruins lose their enforcer. If he somehow concussed Big Z, they lose their best defenseman (arguably among the top league-wide) and their Captain.

  • NYCBruinsFan

    I hope to watch Thornton go out there Sunday and skate a great game against Buffalo and score a goal to two God knows Scott won’t. Beat them and get the two points.

  • Lgbs98

    Hopefully that shuts up all you waiting for retaliation! Thorton fights his own battles and knows what he’s doing. It rarely goes as that one did. Thanks Shawn for being you!

  • Gold Gloves

    They need to outlaw the fighting altogether. Remove the fighting players from the game. There is no reason for an audience to watch a two hour game turn into four hours just because of the fights in the rink. Take one of the days off and schedule a televised cage match with no rules, no gloves, no pads, no sissy’s. Then settle it.

  • Sicko

     I almost fell out of my chair when the officials actually called that slash by Subban with a minute left. I guess the officails realized their mistake and called the joke of a hook on Krejci.

  • Bruinman86

     Was he ever.  Main reason they won indeed. The hooking call was bogus.  Home ref or something.

  • Boslad

    Agree, the NHL has redefined hooking to a point of absurdity. It seems as if a checking player makes contact with his stick to the body of the puck carrier he’s called for hooking. It has become ridiculous. I remember when hooking actually looked like hooking. 

  • Geetsolboy

    Classic make up call by the ref. They were just looking for an opportunity to level the play after the Subban penalty. You can bank on that call in that circumstance against the visiting team almost every time.

  • Fab4ever

    ….and Tuukka continues to excel…small sample but he’s on the right side of the tracks…he was sensational…..and hats off the Claude..this guy doesn’t get enough credit for the job he does…we were told that he’d wear out his welcome before long…well, I don’t see that…what I see is a frim hand on this team…these guys play hard…and what a masterful stroke to mix it up…and this wasn’t a change for change sake…I’m sure he thought about it and bang, he implements it and it worked…

  • Uncle Buck

    No matter what happens there will always be one constant for the games in Montreal, poor officiating, usually tilted towards the home team.  Add that to the fact that the current Montreal club has perfected diving and embellishment and you have a nice combo for the home team. That aside, always nice to go into Montreal and leave with the two points.  Nothing better that beating those Canadiens.  

  • MCDextro

    Chara has never fought with Scott, you are probably thinking of David Koci.

  • glenn88

    The list you are referring to is probably rankings by PIM for fighting majors and not ability to fight.   Luci was voted toughest in the league by actual players.  He isn’t on the list you refer to, because he doesn’t rack up the fighting majors.  Also, Chara is easily in the top 10 based on reach alone.  Not sure anybody has ever gotten the best of Chara.  

  • Deano42

    Correct, writing from memory sometimes leads to errors. Changed it. 

  • Deano42

    Actually no, has very little to do with PIMS. The rankings I am using are here. http://bleacherreport.com/articles/704855-the-top-15-best-fighters-in-the-nhl. Thornton fights a lot more than Chara and Lucic combined and generally takes on the best fighter on the other team, just saying.

    I have never seen Chara win, lose, or even fight lately, nor do I care. That’s not his role, Chara’s role is to be the best defensive defenseman I have ever seen play. Granted Orr and Park were before my time and Bourque was a far better overall defenseman than Chara. However, as a defensive player, Chara eliminates more ice than anyone I have ever seen and plays half the game. 

    Exchanging Chara for Scott, a guy that can’t skate, to maybe come out even in a fight is not worth it. There is no guarantee Lucic or Chara would have won that fight. 

    Let your fighter take the fight and deal with the loss if it happens is what I am saying.

  • bospofan

     Actually Cfn, the Rangers led the league last year in fighting majors and the Bruins were second in that category and they both were very good teams. intimidation is only part of the reason to carry fighters on your team, protection is another.and hard checking does also work to intimidate an opponent. good points by you, as someone who seemingly doesn’t know the game. but from a fans point of view who has watched the Bruins win games since 1973, i can tell you that the fights are just damn awesome to watch! so sit back, grab a cold one, be a man, and enjoy the next Bruins game my friend.

  • glenn88

    The bleacher report list is just designated fighters (goons), most of whom are in and out of the NHL and AHL.  Their #1 fighter is in the AHL.  The writer just took a list of PIM leaders for fighting majors and rated them.  Parras, Thorton and Neal of Ottawa are probably the only 2 guys logging legit minutes on a line.  
    NHL players voted Luci #1 and Chara in their top 10.  Both Horton and Thorton were in the top 20. Another skilled player in the top 20 was a Neal of Pittsburgh.   If you have never watched Chara drop then you don’t watch a lot of Bruins hockey.  He steps in about 6 times a year, but he gets very few takers.  Chara is a beast and always gets hand position on the pads under the chin and uses the jab.  He is almost unbeatable. Also, Luci was voted #1 for a reason.  The percent of drops he gets is high.        

  • Deano42

    You can take whatever list you want. The fact of the matter is this. Thornton is one of the best fighters in the league, so is Scott. Both accepted one lost. 

    Last night is exactly how the Bruins should handle Scott anyways. The guy cannot skate at all. Don’t engage him, make him play because when he is one the ice he is the equivalent to an orange cone. Did you see Marchand make a fool out of him? 

    Okay, so Lucic is probably the best fighter on the team. I never said otherwise, all I said is Thornton is not much worse. Chara by the way has never stepped in 6 times a year as a Bruin. Chara had four fights, total last year, one fight total the year before that, and two fights the year before that? How is that six fights a year? Chara fought a lot more as an Ottawa Senator when he was establishing himself early in his career. Now Chara doesn’t have to fight and shouldn’t take on bad players like Scott. Why would you exchange the best defenseman on your roster for a fourth line winger just to possibly win the fight, but that’s not a guarantee. Just because Thornton is shorter doesn’t mean he stands no chance, just ask PJ Stock and I think he would agree.  

    Before you accuse someone of not watching the games, which is clearly not the case with myself, get your facts straight. 

Celtics Box Score
Celtics Schedule
Celtics Headlines
NBA Headlines