Green Street
NEED TO KNOW
Don't forget to follow Ben on Twitter.
AT&T
A WEEI.com Celtics Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Fast Break: C’s lose their cool in Hot-Lanta 04.29.12 at 9:40 pm ET
By

Before Rajon Rondo lost his cool, Brandon Bass and Kevin Garnett couldn't wrestle the ball loose from Josh Smith. (AP)

The Celtics fell 83-74 on Sunday night in Game 1 of their first-round matchup with the Hawks. Rajon Rondo led the way for Boston with 20 points, but was ejected after arguing a call and bumping into official Marc Davis. Kevin Garnett started poorly, but finished with 20 points (8-19 FG) and 12 rebounds.

For the Hawks, Josh Smith scored 22 points and grabbed 18 rebounds.

WHAT WENT WRONG

Hit in the mouth: The Hawks shot 12-of-22 (54.5%) from the field in the first quarter. Atlanta got to the foul line, created easy transition buckets, and sustained the fervent pace that clearly gives it an advantage over the older Celtics.

The excitement and momentum of playing in front of their home crowd certainly didn’t hurt the strong start, and the Celtics rust from resting their starters didn’t help. Either way, Boston couldn’t stop the bleeding early. The C’s never got to the line and missed all seven of their 3-point attempts in the first half (they finished 0-of-11 from beyond the arc).

Tickets sold out: Garnett’s poor first half played a massive role in the team falling behind by double digits. The Big Ticket was aggressive early, which normally translates to good things for the Celtics. Sunday night, however, KG shot 1-of-9 from the field in the first half. Call it a product of rust, but it would have been wise for Garnett to position himself deeper in the paint when his jumper wasn’t falling.

Meanwhile, Garnett’s adversary, Smith, scored 15 points (7-12 FG) and grabbed 11 boards in the first half alone.

Ray of Light: Game 1 went sour rather quickly for the C’s. While that’s certainly concerning,  a bigger issue is the health of Ray Allen. Last Wednesday, Doc Rivers pronounced Allen probable to play in Sunday night’s series opener, by Saturday the prognosis changed to doubtful, and when it came time to tip off the playoff run Allen was in a suit and tie.

The Celtics could very well survive this series against Atlanta and maybe beat the Derrick Rose-less Bulls without Allen, but Allen makes both of those feats easier.

Losing your cool: The Celtics undoubtedly will be holding their collective breath while awaiting the league’s ruling on Rondo bumping the official. There is a chance Boston could be without him for Game 2.

WHAT WENT RIGHT

Taking over: Rondo has been extremely passive in terms of looking for his own shot this season. When the rest of his team struggled in the first half Sunday, Rondo called his own number, scoring 12 points (6-9 FG) and dishing out four assists. He was assertive because he needed to be. Rondo finished with 20 points, 11 assists and four steals.

It’s frightening to think how ugly this game could have gotten if not for Rondo’s performance. All year long the Big Three have stated this is Rondo’s team, and Game 1 was proof of that.

Getting off the mat: Several times — especially in the opening stages of the second half — the C’s looked primed to make a run and cut the deficit to single digits. The Hawks did a great job thwarting those attempts, and it wasn’t until late in the fourth quarter that Boston closed the gap to five following a 21-7 run. The Celtics then dwindled the advantage down to as little as four with just over a minute left, but Rondo’s subsequent ejection was the final undoing for Boston.

It would have been easy for the Celtics to call it a night, especially since the deficit floated between 10 and 15 points for the better part of the game. Boston struggled, sure, but its effort never relented. The C’s rust was palpable: They shot 39 percent from the field, yet were still in contention late in the contest. If the Celtics can play with the same mettle the rest of the series, their desired results should follow.

Read More: 2012 Playoffs, Atlanta Hawks, Boston Celtics, Rajon Rondo Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • glenn88

    I wouldn’t go overboard with the negativity. They had a tough time scoring this year, but they still had the 3rd best record in the conference. I believe this team was top 6 in the league in scoring in each of the last 3 seasons, but did so with balanced scoring from each of the lines. This year the 3rd line was a disaster from the start as they went from Ryder in 2010, to Benoit P. in 2011 to this year’s Chris B. experiment. The line never recovered and got going. Then your two top line wings (Lucic and Horton) go in the toilet for most of the season. Horton seems to have abandoned his physical game since the concussions and nobody can explain Lucic and what goes through his head day to day. Think Peter and Cam have some work to do in the off season, but I can’t blame Claude for this one as their record was still pretty good.

    • fab4ever

      All solid points my friend….but if you’re a Bruin fan, you understand the thinking in town…and the people feel the team quit…top 3 is fine but they had a chance to be #2 …even #1 at one point but sagged when the games meant something…you’re right about the 3rd line…you’re being too kind. Frankly, it stunk. Lucic? I think he went south once he got paid….just my opinion.

  • Bruinman86

    Underachieved? Nice way of saying they sucked hard. Sure pissed off the fans. Had they won one of those terrible games they blew, they would have won the division. Can’t tell you how many games I watched in the final 20 where I was truly irritated with their performance. With the talent they have, there’s no excuse for how offensively inept they were – whether at even strength or especially on the power play. They looked worse on 5 on 4 and 5 on3 situations then at even strength!!!! As much as I like Claude’s defensive system, I question his ability to make the offense go.

  • Dick Dorkins

    And the award for painfully obvious statement of the year goes to

  • bench warmer

    No power play since Savard went down. How f-ing stupid is Peter Chiarelli? Leaving it up to a defensive minded coach to fix it. The last month has seen more lines than an 80′s coke whore. F.C.N.

  • NYCBruinsFan

    It was an exciting first half of the season full of hopes for a return to the cup finals, to a dismal final 10 games where it seems they didn’t even care to skate and win the division. No excuses for their recent performance. I’m praying they got it all out of their system and hit the ice hard Wednesday against the Leafs.

  • chappy77

    Seems pretty simple – they have not played with any urgency since mid-Feb….about the time they started complaining about the schedule – did they stopm practicing? They’ve coughed up more 3rd period leads than 90% of the Mite teams in NE. The coaches job is to manage and motivate…..he has failed on both fronts (and I like his system). Their lack of productivity on the power play is a league-wide joke, how many times do we have to watch little saucers into the corner then back to Chara at the point for a head-high shot 6 ft wide of the net…why not just line up all 5 guys at the blue line, no one is in front of the goalie anyway. Whomever is responsible for their offense (Houda??) should go – bring in someone who will challenge these guys to get better and MOVE THEIR FEET.

  • https://twitter.com/BostonSportFan1 ChrisinDanvers

    Interesting way to close out the season. They definitely had no sense of urgency and a whole lot of complacency.

    The playoffs will tell the test. Will they return to the team that had hit hard, dominated the puck, and kept teams on their toes. While it would seem likely that they are not, again the shortened season may have something to do with that. With no back-to-backs and the chance to rest between games, this will be the true test of the team.

    If this is a disaster, big changes are due.

  • Bcc

    cleary these guys don’t buy into Claude anymore….EVERY team has played a ton of games in a short time…sick of hearing that excuse. They are done listening to Claude and with his system. He can turn a 40 goal scorer into a 20 goal scorer over night. Can his system with the CUP, yes, as long as you have a goalie (Tim T) who can play like no other goalie ever has….

  • fab4ever

    They lived by the sword, died by the sword…the sword being that physical style…not lost on me was the similarities to the Sunday night game against Montreal this year that they choked a 3rd period lead and that Saturday afternoon game last year against the Canucks…..cheap and dumb penalties, turnovers….and I agree with you that the excuses are lame at this point….I tried to keep thinking that they’d come out of the funk but it never happened…losing 7 of the last 9 is a trend don’t you think?

  • pauliespad

    to me, it’s the causeway country club. no discipline, do as yoy please. i am for a coach change

  • Bruinman86

    Losing 7 of 9 is what they are. Not that team we saw at the beginning of the season. That said, I think they need to move some bodies out of town. Some of them high ticket. I suspect Claude has to go as well, but who do you replace him with? B-s went through coaches like underwear for decades prior to Claude. Prior to Claude (2007-present), no one has been bruins coach for more than three season since Gerry Cheevers in 80-85 – including 7 coaches in the 10 years before Claude!! But, that was all before Chiarelli, so hopefully a change will be good and that trend doesn’t reemerge.

  • fab4ever

    You may be right…the knock on Claude in Montreal was that the guys just quit on him…I’m not smart enough to know the answer but you, myself and a bunch of other folks watch the games and we see the same things…if I have to hear one more time about a “tough schedule” as the reason why they blow 3rd period leads, I’m gonna lock myself in a closet with a boom box and nothing but Weird Al CD’s…it’s more than a “tough schedule”….I don’t think the team has bad talent…I just think they didn’t play hard or smart….and I am of the opinion that once Lucic got paid, he went south…some do, some don’t. He did.

  • necyzyqoxaw

    my neighbor’s mom makes $71 an hour on the internet. She has been fired from work for six months but last month her check was $19681 just working on the internet for a few hours. Read more on  Jive8.c­om

  • fab4ever

    I suspect post season, Peter and Cam will sit down, reassess the team and make some moves…I don’t think Julien will be one of them, just a hunch here…I think they’re smart guys who understand the culture and the fan base…another stinker of a season and there will be hell to pay. It’s one thing to lose, it’s another thing to quit and that’s what I think happened here..a few guys….I thought the addition of Jagr would inject some leadership…it didn’t. Keep in mind, they cannot be playing Z for 3/4 of the game every game….they’re gonna need some help…they need a sniper, they need some help defensively and they need to fix that power play…they got away with it in 2011, they didn’t in 12 & 13….

  • Bruinman86

    I also think Julien could survive this. I just hope they weed out the bad apples on the team and change the chemistry/dynamic. Not enough fight in this bunch. Way too many inconsistent players. the Powerplay has to be a priority. I also like the idea of bringing Jagr back, but he can’t play the minutes he’s been playing at his age. They seriously need a puck moving defensman. Chara is not one. I also think they need to build 1 powerful line with 2 good lines instead of just 3 good lines. I left out Checking line since they will always have one of those. I also wonder about the Goalie situation. WHo stays, who goes? Does Rask stay and Khudobin go? So do they then call up Svedberg from Providence? He seems to be a solid player. Do they make any changes in Juliens coaching staff?

Celtics Box Score
Celtics Schedule
Celtics Headlines
NBA Headlines