Green Street
NEED TO KNOW
Don't forget to follow Ben on Twitter.
AT&T
A WEEI.com Celtics Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
Irish Coffee: How Hawks play without Josh Smith 05.03.12 at 1:56 pm ET
By

If the Hawks are forced to play Game 3 without forward Josh Smith, as expected, or even with him in a limited capacity, they’ll enter new territory this season. His 2,329 minutes rank ninth in the NBA this season, and he’s one of the 7.5 percent of players who played all 66 games of this lockout-shortened year.

While the Hawks listed Smith as day-to-day with a strained left knee, the inflammation as a result of patellar tendinitis leaves him doubtful for Friday night’s game in Boston, according to the Atlanta Journal-Constitution.

“It’s getting better and better each and every day,” said Smith via the AJC’s Michael Cunningham on Twitter. “I will see how it feels at shootaround [Friday]. “I have a high threshold for pain. If I feel like I can go a little bit I’m going to step out on the floor. At shootaround I will probably try to go a little bit harder than normal and see how it feels.”

Unlike the Celtics, who have become accustomed to playing without Ray Allen and a host of others all season long, the Hawks simply aren’t used to playing without Smith, Al Horford (torn pectoral) and Zaza Pachulia (strained left foot). And there are less obvious ramifications beyond that fact.

Smith’s usage rate (defined as the percentage of offensive possessions used by a player during his floor time) of 28.1 percent is the highest on the Hawks and ranks behind only Kevin Love, Dirk Nowitzki and DeMarcus Cousins among the league’s regular bigs. In other words, Atlanta’s offense runs through Smith.

He can score spotting up, posting up, in transition and (lord knows) in isolation. You name it, he does it. As Sports Illustrated’s Zach Lowe noted, “the Hawks have averaged about 104 points per 100 possessions when Smith plays, a borderline top-five mark, and a putrid 97 points per 100 possessions when he sits.” In their two playoff games, Atlanta has scored 90.6 points per 100 possessions with Smith, a stat that only stands to get worse.

Josh Smith's absence or ineffectiveness has serious repercussions on the Hawks' offense and defense. (AP)

Last season, in five games sans Smith, the Hawks finished 1-4, scoring 90 or fewer points in three of those contests. In the two previous seasons, they finished 7-7 without him, and that was the old Josh Smith. The new version enjoyed the most efficient offensive season of his career, even as the rest of the Atlanta offense has become progressively less efficient over the past three seasons.

Smith, Joe Johnson and Jeff Teague have scored 64 percent of Atlanta’s points in the series, and stopping two of them rather than three is a whole lot less difficult. Does Kirk Hinrich, Marvin Williams or a past-his-prime Tracy McGrady really strike fear into the Celtics hearts as a third option?

Defensively, Smith has been tasked with guarding either Brandon Bass or Kevin Garnett, both of whom are equally effective in the post and from mid-range. Smith’s athleticism has countered them well, as neither Bass nor Garnett has been particularly effective this series.

Without Smith, the Hawks are forced to counter with reserves Ivan Johnson and Jason Collins, one marginal and another woefully inept offensive player. While both strong defensively, neither matches the stature of Smith, who received five votes in the NBA Defensive Player of the Year voting.

The C’s offense hasn’t exactly been the “Showtime” Lakers of the 1980s, but the emergence of Garnett and/or Bass offensively can go a long way towards improving their 89.4 points per 100 possessions, especially with Rajon Rondo back in the lineup. Smith’s absence makes that task that much easier.

Statistics aside, the difference between Smith and his potential replacements can be gleaned over the past week from listening to Garnett, who rarely doles out praise to opposing players. Days before describing Ivan Johnson as a nobody, KG said, “Smith has played, to me, some of his best basketball.”

Respect from Garnett isn’t easily earned, and the fact Smith has says pretty much all you need to know.

(Have a question, concern or conception for the next Irish Coffee? Send a message to @brohrbach on Twitter.)

Read More: 2012 Playoffs, Atlanta Hawks, Boston Celtics, Ivan Johnson Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • NE1935

    Great comeback to overcome all the faceoff BS and being down 2-0. A lot of pressure
    in Canada.

  • https://twitter.com/BostonSportFan1 ChrisinDanvers

    Agreed, solid comeback. Tuukka was strong in net when it counted, particularly during that late flurry at the end of regulation. Nice to see this offense putting up big numbers.

    • Troll Hunter

      Yeah, I thought the game was over, in O.T., when he made that glove save on the shot from the slot. Tuukka was immense along with all that first line. Horton gets major props for taking that questionable shot in O.T. to set up the 2 on 1.

      • PCM1

        another “questionable” hit that most assuredly won’t get a hint of a review….

  • bench warmer

    Horton was huge in this game. Glad to see it.
    Rask has to stop the easy ones.

  • Schwank

    Great game from an entertainment standpoint. They were steady and Rask came up big. Toronto is fast and we knew that going in. I knew that if we could withstand the first 5 minutes they’d slow and they did and we got the first break!
    To that idiot Callahan, (who I can’t figure out whether he’s just stirring the pot or whether he truely doesn’t have an in-depth knowledge of hockey or sports) who was trying to make a case this morning for Kessel and why did the B’s trade him? Sure he passed the eyeball test last night and he is incredibly fast. Had the Bruins twisting and turning to keep up with him. But that’s not all it is. He’s inconsistent and disappears at times. He doesn’t back check or play defense. Finally a knowledgeable caller called in and explained + – and how that apllies to Kessel’s career. It was the knock on him when he was here and remains still. Callahan, to his credit, listened albeit he whined about the importance of + or – a little. It’s very important. The equivalent in basketball is the instant offense bench guy that plays 15-18 minutes a game. You ask yourself “why don’t they play that guy 35 minutes?” Because there’s an aspect of their game that is missing (i.e. defense). And because of this they become a liability. That’s Kessel most of the time. Stick em on the powerplay ….sure he’s great. Just not a two way player.

  • tom

    The Bruins could not score even if there was nobody in net. Just like the Celtics the Bruins are scumbags. ITS OVER BRUINS ITS OVER OVER OVER ANOTHER BOSTON TEAM.CHOKES

    • NE1935

      A lot of hostility. Maybe try Church or a shrink.

    • Bruinman86

      They would need to lose the next 2 games as well in order for that to happen. Take a chill pill.

    • Uncle Buck

      Thanks for the insight there tom. Your friend bill is looking for you.

  • NE1935

    Play three periods.

  • http://twitter.com/Zj_6 Zack Jones

    Great night for me, sox win easily and the leafs extend their season for another few days. Not likely that toronto grabs the next two but I’m still hopeful. If not Toronto, I’d like to see the Bruins win the cup. It’d be great for the city, and would help those NY/BOS debates that always come up.

  • mike

    Bruins will get destroyed in Toronto on Sunday and then they will get embarrass and destroyed in the seventh game in front of there own fans. Bruins suck. IT’S ALL OVER BRUINS YOU GUYS CHOKE AGAIN

    • Bruinman86

      Destroyed in Toronto like they did the last 2 games in Toronto? So you are basing this on what? Boston has outscored them 9-5 in Toronto, winning both games. More like wishful thinking on your part instead of facts, as usual.

    • Uncle Buck

      thanks for that tom, er bill, oops sorry, mike. Do you have your own blog somewhere ? Your insight is remarkable.

  • steve

    No way Boston will win this series even with a 3 -2 lead Toronto has better players and more heart toughtness and better skaters

    • Bill plays pocket pool

      What is a “heart toughtness”? Is that like a chocolate in a box?

  • Troll Hunter

    “tom”, “mike”, “steve” it’s pretty obvious you’re the same douch e so why not just post your idiocy under one ID?!? You really sound like that moron Bkk913 that use to post the same crap a couple of years back. Seems like you really need to get a life you piece of shi t…..Now go back to the basement you little turd burglar.

  • bench warmer

    wtf, bruins.

  • Uncle Buck

    Tuukka owned the 1st period, otherwise this one was over early. Frustrating to say the least. This team really could have used a little time off to lick their wounds instead of getting back on a plane to Toronto. Man o man. They better snuff them out Sunday night.

  • Fab4ever

    Can’t say I’m surprised they won but it certainly didn’t look promising early on. David was sensational…that’s what this team needs, that sniper-like offense. I’m totally loving these NHL playoffs. Plenty of upsets, OT drama…can you see me crying because the Canucks got swept? No tears either for the Habs and their flopping..loved the refs ignoring Subban a few times…

  • Gman

    That breeze you just felt was me breathing a sigh of relief upon hearing that news!!!

  • Bruinman86

    I’m felling the same way too!

  • Bruinman86

    That slapper to the face was nasty. Lucic seemed concerned for the guy. I know I would have been too. Very scary stuff. Best of luck to him. Hope he has a full recovery. Health/safety is first, game is second.

  • Bruinman86

    Pretty obvious who wanted it more. The whole team took period 1 off. Can’t say I was impressed with Rask either. Both goals were on the soft side.

  • Bruinman86

    I had a feeling this might happen, given their history of sluggish home games.

  • NYCBruinsFan

    I agree. While Rask made some nice stops early on, but let some real softs shots go throught. Reimer was hot in net for the Leafs instead. We certainly had our opportunities to tie it up or even go ahead. Just didn’t bounce our way. Burins didn’t play their game and didn’t want it bad enough. Now we have to take a trip back up to Tornonto and play another game instead of getting some rest.

  • Bruinman86

    Part of why Reimer did so well is that the Bruins traffic in front of him was ineffective and the Bruins just didn’t get to rebounds like they have before.

Celtics Box Score
Celtics Schedule
Celtics Headlines
NBA Headlines