Green Street
NEED TO KNOW
Don't forget to follow Ben on Twitter.
AT&T
A WEEI.com Celtics Blog
WEEI.com Blog Network
What Doc Rivers sees is a lot more than just the stat sheet 11.22.12 at 8:13 am ET
By

Doc Rivers can read a stat sheet just like everyone else. What it means to him is something entirely different.

The stat sheet says Paul Pierce had zero rebounds in 36 minutes. The stat sheet reads Kevin Garnett hauling in just three rebounds in 31 minutes. Brandon Bass led starters with six and Jared Sullinger led all Celtics with seven. They were outrebounded by San Antonio 41-25 in a 112-100 loss Wednesday night at TD Garden.

“I think it’ll be easy to say ‘the bigs, the bigs.’ It wasn’t the bigs,” Rivers said. “It was, but it wasn’t as well. We thought we started out the game terrific in the way were playing and then we went on that little turnover-fest and got them kind of activated – Tony Parker and their game. I thought we were late on a lot of our rotations and allowed them to just move the ball; very few deflections, which is a big number for us. And then down the stretch (Tiago Splitter) just played terrific.

“He made some big shots them, hell they even went to him a couple times. You know, offensively you score 100 points, 53%, you’re pretty happy. But we just let a team shoot 58% against us. We let a team shoot 50% from the three against us. And it’s tough to win a game, you shouldn’t win a game, if that happens.”

Do the Celtics need to play harder?

“I think we’ve got to do our coverages better, just bottom line,” Rivers said. “Harder and all that, that sounds great. That’s what everyone says when you lose; ‘you’ve got to play harder.’ Well, we’ve got to play smarter, we have to know our coverages better, and when that happens everybody is on the same page and it allows our rotations to be freer, it allows our bigs to get back to the paint. So I thought it was a lot of that.”

Ah, the paint. That’s where the Celtics were outscored 58-34, being dominated at one point, 48-18. But still, that’s not specifically why the Celtics lost. Yes, it’s part of the reason but Rivers points out that when you don’t defend the man delivering the ball into the paint very well, you have no shot. Still, with under three minutes left, the Celtics drew to within six and the Garden was on its feet hoping against hope.

“Yeah, we were right there because nobody could stop anybody on either team,” Rivers said. “Again, we shot 53% so the reason we were there is because our offense allowed us to stay there. But to me, that was fools’ gold, because the way we were playing defense you’re not going to get a stop, you’re not going to win a game. And I think we cut it several times and either we had a turnover and they went and scored or late-clock possessions; I think they got them all. They got all the loose balls, all the late-clock scores, and that hurt us.”

As for having just one offensive rebound, Rivers says that’s all but insignificant to him.

“Honestly, we shot 53%, there’s not going to be a lot of offensive boards,” he said. “You know what I mean? So I’m not that concerned by it. They shot 58% and they had six. So, you’re a big believer in offensive rebounds I think; I’m not. Listen, like I said, you can pick on that all I want. That is a number I rarely look at, is offensive rebounds. Statistically it holds up. I can tell you, you don’t offensive rebound, you stop transition, you win more games than when you get offensive rebounds. I can guarantee you that on those stats.

“Obviously we would like to get some offensive rebounds, and if we’re under there we’ll take them, and we didn’t get any, but that ain’t why we lost. Let me just say that. Offensive rebounds is the least of our problems.”

What do the Celtics have to fix by Friday, when they host Kevin Durant and the Thunder?

“A lot. Like not letting a team score 112 points would be one,” Rivers said with a pained smile. “Actually, I thought our transition D was below average today. Big possession down the stretch, I think (Rajon) Rondo missed a lay-up and we had – I think (Leandro) Barbosa missed a jump shot – we had plenty of time to get back, and we’re getting back but we’re not getting matched up. That’s our issue. Guys are running back, so that’s number one. Our pick-and-roll defense has got to improve. Right now teams are picking on us in our pick-and-roll D, so that has to improve.”

Read More: Boston Celtics, Doc Rivers, NBA, San Antonio Spurs Print  |  Email  |  Bark It Up!  |  Digg It
  • Rockdog

    Amazing how many Patriot Haters visit these Patriots polls.  NO WAY 48% of true Patriots fans want Tebow in NE.  NO WAY!

  • Jack O’Leary

    The only reason Tim Tebow should come to New England is to hold a sermon before the team heads out of the locker room. Both back up QB’s are better than Tebow. He’d be nothing but a headache. Ship him to Jax so we never have to hear his name again.

  • Ninjaman

    Why don’t the Pats trade for me instead?  I possess the same attributes that Tebow does.  I pray daily and I can’t throw.

    • http://sbpra.com/paulvsuffriti Paul V. Suffriti

      But does God find favor with you?

  • Dharpell

    If they could bring him in as a running back, but he would have to cost less than 3 mil.  Everyone would like him to come here but it is not possible

  • Heck NO

    If the Patriots get Tebow I will renounce my lifelong allegiance to the team.  

    • mikepatriot

      Ahh come on. You should already be renouncing it because they picked up El Stinko. TB has positively got to be of infinitely more value than Tweet Stinkie……

  • Jimmy Freeze

    When he’s not playing QB or RB, he could play slot corner, and run back punts, and be the backup field goal kicker.  Imagine how many trick plays they could run out of FG formation…or he could be the guy 1/2 way back to the punter, because Chung messed up the fake punt play 2 yrs ago…Tebow would be a fake punt machine

  • Dunn4911

    Please no! We don’t need him.put Hernandez in and let him do what t bag does.waste of time . Go figure if the pats got him and used him on some plays it’s obvious what he’s gona do.we all know he can’t throw.

  • mikepatriot

    Eureka, stop the presses. I’ve found my big running back. Why not take a chance on him in what i’ve been advocating; a solid (not finesse) running back. He could have the ball pitched back to him occasionally, but if he were willing to accept this role it could be interesting. You need to find a niche for this guy. I think it’s almost a given that he would never be the kind of disruptive force we’ve had from a handful of divas the past 5 years. He could bring alot more energy from the fans, it would be wild, certainly the :P ats would gain many more “convert” fans from around the country who absolutely despise our team, ( not that i care a whit). Why not take a chance? BB has rolled the dice on his share of bums, and TB aint no bum. Hep me, i dun got the fever, Tebowmania! 

  • Patsfan

    You can not convince me that this guy would not be a weapon on this team.McDaniels has clearly shown he is one of the most creative play callers in the league and definitely had some ideas for him when he drafted him. Plus, who knows, maybe he develops a few years down the road and when Brady finally retires we have 2 options at qb

    • LLFF

      Tim Tebow is NOT A TIGHT END.  Tim Tebow is NOT A RUNNING BACK.  Tim Tebow is barely even a quarterback by NFL standards.  What kind of weapon would Tebow be for the Patriots?  What is going to bring to the table that the Patriots need?

      I don’t really recall McDaniels doing anything special with Tebow in Denver, nor anything extraordinarily creative in his previous time with the Pats that would translate to maximizing whatever skills Tebow allegedly brings to the table.  He’s talented as a coordinator, but he’s not a wizard.  Not that there’s a great need of offensive gimmicks with the talent the team already has on hand.

      They already have one of the most prolific offenses in the league.  They
      already have an all-world quarterback with three Super Bowl rings and
      two MVPs to his name.  They’ve got an all pro WR and an all pro TE as primary targets.  They have an ever deepening supporting cast beyond those two as well.  They have had no trouble moving the ball up and down
      the field nor with putting the ball in the end zone the last couple years. 
      The last thing they need is a gimmick in their offense.  The last thing they need is Tim Tebow.

      What they need is to improve the talent on the defensive side of the ball.  If they’re going to spend draft picks, better to do it there than in a trade to acquire a needless player like Tebow.

  • http://profiles.yahoo.com/u/ZVFM2HRNC5CTO2OUXD4XTX65O4 Dennis

     I just can’t believe 46% said yes. First off, where would he play?  And two, his 15 minutes of fame were up long ago. He’s got Flutieitis.

  • Lipper

    Deff bring Tebow aboard! Can you say many options- Fullback, Running back, Wildcat!

  • Moose

    He’s a great kid with integrity, he is an athlete and my guess is he’s not too expensive. A great addition to the locker room. He may be a better deal than some of the free-agents with a history of injuries.

    But, he would be a asset in only limited situations. As a back he can run the ball and in those 3rd and 4 type situations that arm might keep the defense spread just enough to make plays and move the chains

    • Chip

       Why would he be on the field on 3rd and 4? He doesn’t give you a better chance of converting than Tom Brady to Welker.

  • Redsox

    He is just a no good religious freek!!!!! Screw Tebow let him play for Jesus’ team!!!

  • James

     If he can play any other position but QB for the Pats then he is definitely a perfect fit. Pretty much every position on defense the Patriots are weak at and in the backfield they’re a no threat.

  • pucky

    f yea bring in d’jesus–he’ll fly.  If he can’t multiply the loaves and fishes we’ll lance him after the crucifixion. 

  • 123Star

    Straight up trade, Ocho for “TT”. As a person, they don’t come any better.

  • http://www.facebook.com/people/John-Wesley-Harding/623591591 John Wesley Harding

    I think he would be great in the wildcat and even as running back. He would have to know his part in the O and buy into it before I would spend money on him. 

  • tdjohnson

    Bring him to NE – Belichik has a way to find the best way to use a player, AND since Brady is NOT a running quarterback, its nice to have options.

  • Punaa

    why not, he is a great athelete, great person as welllet Belichick use him for some options to use, it doesn’t have to be at quarterback, he knows his days as a everyday for a long period of time is very short in this league, why not keep open for then idea for another or many positions he can be used in, sky is the limit with this player if used right

  • Threesaints

    We’re stocked at tight end. We could use a blocking fullback who can also carry the ball, but that’s the ONLY way I ever want to see the worst NFL QB in the modern ear as a Patriot!

  • USA Karate RI

    I have no issues with bringing Tebow here.  The “distractions” only exist if it is allowed to exist, which we all know here in NE, it will die off.  

    Bottom line is that Tebow is somebody who has an excellent attitude and work ethic. I have no doubt that if he is brought here BB will get the most out of him and Tebow will also have the opportunity to learn from a real QB! 

    I say let the Patriots give him a try-out. 

  • Ivanmike

    I am a life long Pats fan, former season ticket holder, now living in Colorado.
    I watched Tebow all last season and think he has great potential 
    He is the hardest worker I have ever seen, He would be a great backup and a future great player

  • http://www.facebook.com/gofucckyourself Richard James DiLullo

    tims going to take the place of brady once brady retires. Brady is 36 years old. hes a few good hits away from retiring. 

  • Alcroft

    Watch your back my friend

  • mikepatriot

    Unwelcome trolls suck yeahhhhh

  • Threesaints

    Riiiight. The most consistent team of the past decade sucks. Matcules is obviously a tootsie loving Jets fan!

  • http://profile.yahoo.com/ZZ4HL5AWSGCUX5PLT27IDKVFPU Kevin

    Yea, all those wins, year after year, after year are such a drag. Pats would be dumb to acquire a kid with heart as big as a watermelon.

  • Pats Fan for Life

    Is there a dislike button anywhere?

  • armchair qb

    No. definitely don’t get rid of Hoyer for TB. Mallet, however, from what ive heard, is NOT in thier long range goals and i would take TB straight up even for RM.

  • mark

    That would be 12 men on the field.  If Tebow is at FB, then there has to be a RB.  Add those 2 to the 5 man O-line and QB and you’re already at 8 men.  If Tebow steps on the field as a FB, then one of Gronk/Hernandez/Welker/Lloyd is on the sidelines.  Thus, he would only be used in 100% run situations. I’d love to see him on the Pats, but there is rarely going to be an opportunity where him being on the field is a better option than Gronk/Hernandez/Welker/Lloyd and the RBs.

  • mark

    I’d rather have Brady passing the ball to whoever is open out of Gronk/Hernandez/Welker/Lloyd than snap the ball to Tebow and let him create some rediculous play.

  • mark

    I would only trade for Tebow if it was a no-brainer, like a 5th round pick.  However, I doubt he’d come that cheap.  Some small market team will offer a 1st round pick because it will result in tons of revenue for their team. 

    The main reason I don’t see Belichick going after Tebow is that he would barely be used.  Best case scenario, he gets a few snaps a game at FB, RB, blocking TE, and possibly the wild-cat or something lame like that.  AKA, he would only be used when the Pats are in a run-situation.  Is that worth 4M/year?  nope.

  • NorminCT

    …and Tim Wakefield is gone already!

Celtics Box Score
Celtics Schedule
Celtics Headlines
NBA Headlines